Super Shareware Collection/Super Shareware Collection.iso/info/nwarmy.zip/NWARMY.TXT

Text File | 1994-03-17 | 10KB | 188 lines

Today's "trivia" questions are......

"What are the *actual* connections between U.S. military base
closings and the "New World Order", with its accompanying "New
World Police Force"? Why are a number of these bases, currently
slated to be closed for U.S. military use, currently undergoing
expensive renovations and additions?"

You can check the following item out very quickly at the
Library of Congress, or at any large metropolitan reference
library, and I can promise you that it won't be time wasted!

Ask for a copy of VOLUME 9 of the 1982 EDITION [*not* the
current, replacement edition] of the U.S. CODE. Turn to page
554, where you'll find the beginning of PUBLIC LAW # 87-297
[1961]. This law was signed by President Kennedy in 1962,
has received 18 subsequent updates, and its provisions have
been steadily implemented by every President since. IT CALLS
FOR THE ELIMINATION OF THE U.S. NATIONAL ARMED FORCES and
further declares that "NO ONE MAY POSSESS A FIREARM OR LETHAL
WEAPON EXCEPT POLICE AND MILITARY PERSONNEL". The progressive
steps in its implementation are:

 1. the reduction of the U.S. Armed Forces to 2.1 million
    personnel.

 2. their irrevokable merger with Russian and Chinese forces,
    in two stages, to form a World Army [50% of total U.S.
    force strength will be merged in the first stage; the
    remaining 50% in the second stage].

 3. the irrevokable surrender of authority over such forces
    to the U.N. Secretary-General [ who alrady has a military
    planning staff of 80 general officers].

 4. the confiscation of all privately-held firearms.

This law is taught and explained in the National War College,
and the various U.S. Armed Forces Academies. The New World Order
will require an Army: this is it, and presumably the U.S. itself
could then find itself policed by foreign troops under the U.N.
flag. By agreement, THE COMMANDER OF THIS ARMY MUST ALWAYS BE A
RUSSIAN!

The relevant pages and sections are: page 554; page 555 [lower
right-hand side of page: defines "disarmament" as elimination
of U.S. Forces and calls for absolute restrictions on
privately-owned "deadly weapons"]; page 557, sections [a] and
[d] [again, require U.S. to eliminate its Armed Forces]; page
558 deals with "policy formulation" [i.e. the accomplishment of
these goals]. George Bush said that the passing of authority
to the Secretary-General was "in transition"; the Supreme Court
has already ruled that the U.S. Constitution and its provisions
stand UNDER the U.N. Charter and the Resolutions of the United
Nations. The U.S. Armed Forces are acting as the U.N.'s "world
policeman" in the interim.

The provisions of this law are further explained in STATE
DEPARTMENT PUBLICATION 72-77, which itself is published in
unabridged form in the 35-page "BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE",
published by U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY
[PUBLICATION #4, GENERAL SERIES #3, MAY 1962]. I'm sure you find
this hard to believe, but it's all there in black and white;
read it for yourself! The implications are staggering but the
multiple military base closings around the U.S take on a new
perspective when you see the agenda which that law commits
the U.S. government to follow! Another small tip is that new
issues of uniforms [e.g. the new Air Force uniform] reportedly
have no "U.S."insignia.

Please do go and read these documents for yourself. It's
astonishing, but it's exactly as I've described it to you.
NAFTA is a small but vital part of something *much* bigger!

Don't be misled by the wording of "Policy Formulation" on page
558 in volume 9, U.S. CODE, 1982. It was re-written in 1963 to
pacify objectors, and forbids removal of firearms from the
populace or reduction in national armed strength "UNLESS IT IS
PURSUANT TO THE TREATY-MAKING POWER OF THE PRESIDENT OR
AUTHORISED BY LEGISLATION OF THE CONGRESS"! The U.N Charter is
regarded as an already-binding treaty, so all that is required
is a U.N. Resolution or Congressional legislation to ban all
"citizen" armaments. George Bush's father, Preston, helped push
this law [87-297] through Congress. One of the experts
on it is ex-State Senator Bernadine Smith [Box 1776, HANFORD,
CALIFORNIA 93232], who resisted it bitterly, and knows its
contents and intent as well as anybody. Or you could just call
the National War College and ask innocently for more information
on it!


Two interesting footnotes on PUBLIC LAW 87-297 {1961}:

 * 200 members of the Trilateral Commission had a late-March
   meeting over several days in Washington, at which they
   discussed and agreed on the need for [guess what?] A NEW
   WORLD ARMY and for U.N. SOVEREIGN CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL
   STATES' IMMIGRATION POLICIES AND DECISIONS. On the evening
   of the 28th of March, their representatives dined with key
   U.S. government officials and presented these
   "recommendations", and then did the same thing over
   breakfast the next morning with Clinton. So here it comes!
   This will lead ultimately to an enormous concentration of
   power in very few hands.

 * AFT, as the "compliance and enforcement" arm of the Treasury
   Department [which has a CFR man heading it], has been
   unlawfully "compelling" gunshop owners across the U.S. to
   provide the names, addresses and zip codes of all "long gun"
   [rifle and shotgun] purchasers, when no legal requirement
   exists for this. They are apparently creating a computerised
   registry of ALL private weapons across the United States,
   by locality, street and house. REMEMBER THE CONFISCATION
   REQUIREMENT FOR ALL PRIVATE WEAPONS EMBODIED IN "A
   BLUEPRINT FOR THE PEACE RACE" AND IN STATE DEPARTMENT
   PUBLICATION # 72-77?

THIS LAW IS STILL IN THE *CURRENT* EDITION OF THE U.S. CODE,
ALTHOUGH THE PAGE NUMBERS HAVE BEEN CHANGED. YOU CAN FIND
IT FAIRLY EASILY BY CHECKING THE INDEX TO THE U.S.CODE.

                      - o O o -

So you think that this is fanciful? Read this news item,
which appeared earlier this year.....

RUSSIAN-AMERICAN DEFENCE AGREEMENT CALLS FOR JOINT
MANEUVERS
WASHINGTON: The United States and Russia signed an agreement
Wednesday on military cooperation that provides for joint
military maneuvers by the two former Cold War foes.
    The Russian Defense Minister, General of the Army Pavel
Grachev, who is visiting Washington, signed the memorandum of
understanding with Defense Secretary Les Aspin at a Pentagon
ceremony.
    The agreement calls for the two sides to hold joint
maneuvers that practice peacekeeping techniques.
    The agreement also calls for annual meetings between
Grachev and Aspin and their successors, exchanges between the
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian
counterpart and a bilateral defense working group to formulate
projects of Russian-American defense.
    "This ceremony demonstrates again that the relationship
between our two countries is undergoing historic
transformation," Aspin said.
    "As President Clinton and President Yeltsin said at their
Vancouver summit meeting," he said, "we are establishing a
strategic partnership," Aspin said. "It is a partnership in
which military and defense relations play a leading role."
    "Russia places its highest priority on its cooperation
with the United States," Grachev said, "We promise to do all
in our power...to realize this agreement."
    The Russian-American ground maneuvers will train the two
sides in peacekeeping techniques. The first units to
participate will be the U.S. 3rd Mechanized Infantry Division
and the Russian 27th Motorized Rifle.
    Both division commanders, U.S. Maj. Gen. Leonard Holder, Jr.
and Russian Maj. Gen. Anatoliy Sidyakin, were on hand for the
Pentagon ceremony.
    "Our two commanders, right after the signing of this
agreement, will sit down at a table and start working out a
whole series of steps to make this all happen," Grachev said.
    Both Grachev and Aspin said they wanted to establish a
"hotline" between their respective defense establishments
although provision for that was not actually in the agreement
they signed.
    In addition to joint peacekeeping exercises, the
memorandum calls for annual meetings between Aspin and Grachev
and their successors, exchanges between the chairman of the U.S.
Joint Chiefs of Staff and his Russian counterpart and a
bilateral working group to think up more projects for
Russian-American military cooperation.
    No date or place for the first joint Russian-American ground
maneuver has yet been set.
    Pressed on whether the exercise would be held this year,
Grachev noted that the planning time needed for maneuvers of so
large a scale would mean that if so, it would probably have to
start during the [?]
    "The 3rd Division commander," he joked, "said if it's OK
with them, we can go to Siberia and hold them there."

                      - o O o -

Interested in learning more? Download NWO_NO!.TXT from this BBS
[or from CRS Online, Toronto], for more background information
and an excellent reading list.

     PLEASE RE-POST THIS FILE WIDELY TO OTHER BBS SYSTEMS!